April 09, 2013
Evidence Based Birth Takes on Group B Strep: An Interview with Rebecca Dekker
By: Sharon Muza, BS, LCCE, FACCE, CD/BDT(DONA), CLE | 0 Comments
Occasional Science & Sensibility contributor Rebecca Dekker of Evidence Based Birth has spent the last month writing a blog article about Group B Strep and it is finally here! In her painstaking but clear review of the evidence on GBS in pregnancy, Rebecca came to the conclusion that universal screening and treatment for GBS is more effective than treating with antibiotics based on risk factors alone. She also found that although 'probiotics, chlorhexadine, and garlic have the potential to reduce vaginal and newborn colonization with GBS, we do not have evidence yet to show that these strategies can prevent early GBS infections, since GBS infection usually occurs when GBS gains access to the amniotic fluid and gets into the fetus's lungs during labor.'
To read Rebecca's just released article, Group B Strep in Pregnancy: Evidence for Antibiotics and Alternatives in its entirety, click here.
Today, Rebecca joins us on Science & Sensibility to talk about her latest addition to Evidence Based Birth.
Sharon Muza: What inspired you to write this article?
Rebecca Dekker: I received more requests to write about Group B strep than any other topic! Over the past few months, I had weekly, sometimes daily emails and Facebook messages from women'all asking me to provide them with evidence about antibiotics, hibiclens, or garlic for preventing GBS infections. After about the 50th request, I figured I better set aside my other plans and focus on this topic, because it was clearly weighing heavily on many women's minds!
SM: What was the most difficult thing about writing this article?
RD: Probably the most difficult thing was sorting through the stacks and stacks of research articles that have been published about Group B strep in pregnancy. This was one of the reasons it took me almost a year of blogging before I decided to dive into group B strep. I knew it would be a monumental task. And it was. But I was fortunate enough to have an expert in GBS who helped point me to the most important or 'landmark' studies.
SM: Who was this expert?
RD: I met Dr. Jessica Illuzzi via email earlier this year. She and I had corresponded about a different blog article, and at that time I found her to be incredibly helpful. I knew that in addition to being an OB, Dr. Illuzzi was a research expert in GBS. So I asked her if she would review my article for me. To be honest, I could not have written this article without her guidance. She read my first draft and basically told me that I needed to go back to the drawing board. She encouraged me to dig deeper into the evidence so that I would really understand it. Whenever I had questions about something, she sent me research articles that immediately answered my question. In the end, I knew the article was ready when she said it was a great summary of the state of the science of GBS.
I was also lucky enough to have 2 other GBS experts give me feedback on the article'a GBS researcher and a microbiologist. And then I have several physicians who faithfully review all of my articles and give great suggestions. I am very grateful to all of them as well!
SM: I know that you usually begin your articles with an exploration of your own biases, in order to tease the bias out of your writing. Did you have any pre-existing biases about GBS?
RD: To be honest, I actually had no biases up front. I was fortunate to always test negative for GBS myself, and so I never had to struggle with this issue before. I was pretty open-minded to the entire issue. I was open-minded to antibiotics. I was open-minded to hibiclens or other alternatives. I had no personal agenda. I simply wanted to get to the facts. Hopefully this lack of bias will shine through and help people respect the article even more.
SM: What surprised you most as you wrote this article?
RD: One of the things that surprised me was how people have such different reactions when they read the evidence about GBS. I had several friends preview the article for me. Some of them instantly said, 'Oh yeah, that sounds like a really high risk. I'd definitely take the antibiotics to prevent an infection in my newborn.' Others would say, 'Really? That's all? That's not a very high risk at all. I wouldn't take antibiotics for that level of risk.' This is a great example of how everyone perceives risk differently. But at least in this article I have been able to put some evidence-based facts out there. Let people interpret the risks as they may. I only ask that they talk with their health care provider before making any decisions!!
SM: What do you think is the future of GBS evidence?
RD: Ten years from now I am guessing that I could write a very different article. I would like to think that by then we may have a vaccine on the horizon that could prevent both early GBS infections and GBS-related preterm birth. It would also be nice if the rapid test was affordable and widely available by then. I would also LOVE to see some solid research evidence on the use of probiotics for decreasing GBS colonization rates in pregnant women. As far as I know, probiotics for decreasing GBS hasn't been studied yet in pregnant women, and I think it deserves further inquiry.
SM:What makes your blog article about GBS different than all the other blog articles out there on this topic?
RD: I purposefully didn't look at any of the other GBS blog articles out there until I finished my article. Yesterday, I read through a variety of blog articles (there are a lot!). Most of them were about 90-95% accurate in their facts. A couple of them had serious errors (in particular, I found one blog article that had inaccurate information about hibiclens). Most didn't list any references, and I could tell that most of the blog authors had used secondary sources (other blogs or summary articles) instead of looking at the research evidence themselves. This can be fine, but sometimes it's a bit like playing telephone: You just keep repeating the same facts over and over without checking to see if the evidence has changed or if the summary you are parroting was accurate in the first place. I'd like to think that my blog article is a very accurate assessment of the research evidence on GBS in pregnancy'translated into regular language so that women and their family members can understand the evidence.
SM: What are you going to write about next?
RD: I don't know!! What would YOU like to see me write about?
SM: I want to thank you Rebecca, for your contributions to Science & Sensibility and for sharing Evidence Based Birth with the world! I know that these articles take a huge amount of time and you are very diligent and conscientious about researching the literature and providing only the best analysis possible, and seeking out experts on the topic to help you really be sure that you are offering the best of the best of information. I always enjoy reading your blog and find it a great source of information for my doula and CBE students and my birth doula clients as well. I know that I speak for all the readers here on Science & Sensibility when I say, keep on keeping on! Do please let Rebecca know what you would like her to write about next!
TagsPregnancy Research Evidence Based Birth Rebecca Dekker Informed Consent Group B Strep Tests In Pregnancy Labor/Birth Newborns Maternal Infant Care Antibiotics GBS Prenatal Testing