Make a Donation
     Connect with UsFacebookTwitterYouTube
    Google Custom Search

    Questions? Ask Henci!


    Find out what other moms-to-be are asking. Join in the discussion with Henci Goer, whose expertise is determining what the research tells us best promotes safe, healthy birth. If you would like to contact Henci outside of the Ask Henci forum, send an email to Goersitemail@aol.com.

    You must establish a username and password to participate in the Ask Henci forum, click here to submit your request.


    Archived User

    My OB told me today that the research shows that patients diagnosed with GD benefit from stress tests 2 time a week because it has been shown that if you have a normal stress test your baby's chance of living thru the next 4 days is 98-99%.   Do you know the research she is citing and do you know of any other that promote or not the effectiveness of the nonstress tests?

    Thank you.

    Henci Goer

    I don't. Ask your ob for the research, and I will be happy to go over it for you.

    I can say this, though: the problem with all tests of fetal well-being is their high false-positive rates, that is, the test says there is a problem, but there really isn't. In a healthy woman, which you are if your GD is under control--or even in a woman with moderate problems--the test is much more likely to be wrong than right if it says there is a problem. But no one is going to sit on their hands with a test result that says the baby is in trouble, so women who have tests of fetal well-being are not infrequently going to end up with labor inductions, cesarean surgeries, or both that they didn't need. Add on to that the false-negative rate: the test says everything is fine when it isn't. It is also possible to have a true positive where delivering the baby won't solve the problem. In fact, it is also possible for a compromised baby to be able to tolerate normal labor but not induced labor where contractions can be longer, stronger, and closer together. Even a healthy baby can be distressed who wouldn't have been with natural contractions. (This, of course, just reinforces the medical model approach. "Thank goodness we intervened," everyone says, it never occurring to them that intervening was what caused the baby to go into distress.) In short, the odds are 99.9% that your baby  will live through the next four days whether you have the stress test or not, and you could end up with a cesarean that you didn't really need and, ironically, that puts you, your baby, and future babies at greater risk of death and serious harm.

    -- Henci

    Archived User

    Thanks Henci. I will see about getting the research she is citing at my next visit. 


    All Times America/New_York

    Forum Disclaimer

    Please note that this Forum is intended to help women make informed decisions about their care. The content is not a substitute for medical advice.



    Copyright 2014 Lamaze International. All rights reserved. Privacy Statement | Terms of Use