Lamaze.org > Online Community > Ask an Expert

Bookmark and Share

home | contact us | site map | Login
Ask Henci

Henci GoerFind out what other moms-to-be are asking.  Join in the discussion with Henci Goer, an expert in obstetric research. If you would like to contact Henci outside of the Ask Henci forum, send an email to Goersitemail@aol.com.

If you would like your own username and password for the Ask Henci forum, click here to submit your request.


Planned VBAC with C/S date?
Last Post 03 Apr 2009 04:45 PM by Henci Goer, BA. 1 Replies.
AddThis - Bookmarking and Sharing Button Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
Author Messages
Vannesa (guest)
Posts:666
Avatar


--
01 Apr 2009 02:35 AM QuoteQuote ReplyReply

Hello!  Thank you for this great forum.  I have found it (and its predecessor) to be such a useful resource through many years of my doula work and my own mothering!

Today's question:  I have a friend  who is 39.5 weeks pregnant now and planning and passionately hoping for a VBAC.  She is working with a team of hospital-based CNMs who seem to be quite supportive of VBAC.  She and her care-providers decided together to schedule a repeat cesarean at 41 weeks, feeling that by that time, it will just feel like time to get the baby out.  I think the thinking has to do with their prediction that the baby will be large.  I think there is also a sense of not wanting to head down the same road she went down with baby #1.  My friend's first cersarean birth occured at 42 weeks for "failure to progress" after an induction. She had virtually no amniotic fluid.

I absolutely honor my friend's ability to makes choices that feel right to her, but I also feel how fervently she hopes for this VBAC, and I fear that this plan lowers her chances, both because it gives her less time to go into labor and because it creates a feeling of pressure now.  From the standpoint of research on the interactions between baby size and VBAC safety and success, does this plan make sense?  Can you think of any reason why it might be advisable to plan to operate at 41 weeks?

Thank you for any thoughts!

Henci Goer, BAUser is Offline
Ask Henci
Ask Henci
Posts:429
Avatar


--
03 Apr 2009 04:45 PM QuoteQuote ReplyReply

Some studies report greater likelihood of the scar giving way with pregnancies of longer duration, but the excess lay in induced labors. Spontaneous onset also maximizes the chances of vaginal birth with a big baby in any labor, not just VBAC labors. (That being said, inducing with a ripe cervix can eliminate the difference  in rates of symptomatic scar problems, and induction agents and protocols make a difference in scar rupture rates as well. In other words, spontaneous onset is optimal, but when induction is truly needed, it does not mean that planned cesarean is the better option only that  as the Wicked Witch of the West said, "These things must be done delicately.") I will be happy to provide more detailed information from the manuscript of the forthcoming new edition of Obstetric Myths Versus Research Realities to your friend and her midwives if one or the other wants to e-mail me at goersitemail@aol.com , but I emphasize the word "wants." From your post, it looks to me like your friend has made a considered and nuanced decision, and while you may have issues with her choice, she does not. You, of course, know the situation and your friend better than I, but be careful that you respect her right to make her choice even if it differs from what you think you would choose under her circumstances.

-- Henci



Active Forums 4.1
Read the Forum Terms & Conditions

Copyright 2009 · All Rights Reserved · 2025 M Street, NW, Suite 800 · Washington, D.C. 20036-3309
800/368-4404 · 202/367-1128 · 202/367-2128 (fax)

Privacy Statement · Terms of Use