Home  | Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Login  
    Normal Birth Forum


Normal Birth Forum Featuring Henci Goer
Subject: Group B Strep prevention with probiotics

Add Reply   
Author Messages
irishgirlz (guest)

07/22/2008 11:36 PM Quote Reply

Henci (and any others they may be able to shed light)-

I am a doula currently working on my bachelor's in nursing to eventually become a CNM and attend homebirths after my indentured servitude is up. I would like to know if there is any valid data (studies or clinical trials) that show that probiotic supplementation through the diet or using probiotic preparations directly on or in the vagina will prevent GBS colonization. I read blogs about stillbirth often because it is what I most fear about becoming a midwife and there seems to be some evidence that 4-10 percent of unexplained stillbirth may actually be caused by intrauterine infections caused by GBS.

In my reading of these blogs I came across a particularly well educated woman with a science background of some kind that was pregnant after stillbirth. An intrauterine GBS infection with an intact bag of waters played a role in the death of her baby and she and her doctor had layed out a plan to do monthly GBS tests throughout the pregnancy, treating with antibiotics anytime GBS was detected. Another person commented that the antibiotics may cause the GBS colonization to worsen and suggested a daily intake of probiotic foods and/or a probiotic supplement to prevent colonization.

To this suggestion the pregnant woman replied that there was no evidence that probiotics could help suppress GBS colonization and that the commenter was mistaken. The commenter posted back with a few different Pubmed abstracts that related to GBS suppression with different applications of probiotics. I will post a link to this whole discussion (I found it interesting). What I'm wondering is if it is yet known scientifically whether or not probiotics will actually prevent or suppress GBS colonization. The pregnant woman with a science background did not seem to think that any of the studies showed probiotics could be beneficial in this application. Here is a link to the site where I read about all of this. I thank anyone who can shed some light on this for me. I will suggest daily probiotic use to all my pregnant clients if this is the case.

http://www.glowinthewoods.com/home/2008/7/8/pubmed-says-gbs-infection-in-pregnancy.html

Henci Goer
Posts:0

07/24/2008 11:39 AM Quote Reply

I have not searched out any research on the effectiveness of probiotics, but my understanding of probiotics is that they can help maintain and restore the normal harmless and beneficial flora and fauna that are indiscriminately killed off by antibiotics, not that they have any antibacterial effect themselves. In women who are given antibiotics, such as GBS + women, they are useful for preventing problems such as thrush, a yeast infection that can, for example, inflame nipples and the baby's mouth, wreaking havoc with breastfeeding.

-- Henci

irishgirlz (guest)

07/24/2008 12:11 PM Quote Reply

Henci and others- Here are some abstracts from studies listed in PubMed relating to probiotics and pathogens in the urogenital tract. If anyone has the time to read through the study texts, I would appreciate knowing your different interpretations of them.


 

Fatih Universitesi Tip Fakültesi, Mikrobiyoloji ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dali, Ankara.

Neonatal group B streptococcal (GBS) infections are one of the important health problems because of their high mortality and morbidity rates in certain countries. There are some preventive approaches, including perinatal antibiotic therapy against these infections. Recently, vaccination with conjugated GBS polysaccharides has also been practised. In this study, the in vitro inhibitory effects of 51 lactobacilli (of them 50 were purified from vaginal swabs, 1 from a commercial vaginal tablet) on five GBS (4 clinical isolates and 1 standard strain) were investigated by sandwich plate technique and deferred antagonism well technique. Ten clinical isolates (20%) and the drug-purified Lactobacilli expressed pronounced inhibitory effects on growth of GBS. All of the inhibitory isolates and 10 randomly selected non-inhibitory isolates were identified by API 50CHL kit (BioMeriéx, France). Seven (70%) of the inhibitory clinical isolates were Lactobacillus rhamnosus. The inhibitory isolates had higher acid production than the non-inhibitory ones (p < 0.05), and pH-adjustment destroyed their inhibitory effects entirely. If these results could be applied in vivo, it could be postulated that administration of certain lactobacilli as probiotics via an appropriate regimen may be a safe, physiological and cheaper alternative for prevention of neonatal GBS infections.

PMID: 15900833 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 

Rönnqvist PD, Forsgren-Brusk UB, Grahn-Håkansson EE.

Department of Clinical Bacteriology, Umeå University, Sweden. daniel.ronnqvist@essum.se

BACKGROUND: The relationship between lactobacilli and other microbes and the association with vaginal pH in the female genital tract were examined. The study also included evaluation of the possibility of supplying probiotics to the genital tract by using panty liners impregnated with the probiotic strain Lactobacillus plantarum LB931. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter study involving 191 healthy fertile women. Specified microbes were counted and vaginal pH was measured once a month for five consecutive months. RESULTS: Major individual variations in the genital microflora composition and the vaginal pH were found among the women. The number of lactobacilli was significantly related to vaginal pH (p<0.001) and approximately 70% of the women were permanent carriers of individual lactobacilli strains. Women with high numbers of lactobacilli were less prevalent with Group B streptococci than women with low numbers (p=0.036), and these women had a lower mean vaginal pH. The number of lactobacilli also correlated with the prevalence of yeast. LB931 could be found in 86% of the labial samples and 54% of the vaginal samples. CONCLUSIONS: High numbers of lactobacilli may contribute to a low vaginal pH and seem to have a negative influence on Group B streptococci. LB931 could be transferred from the panty liners to both the vagina and the labial fold.

PMID: 16752267 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Reid G, Charbonneau D, Erb J, Kochanowski B, Beuerman D, Poehner R, Bruce AW.

Lawson Health Research Institute, Canadian Research and Development Center for Probiotics, 268 Grosvenor Street, London, ON, Canada N6A 4V2. gregor@uwo.ca

Urogenital infections afflict an estimated one billion people each year. The size of this problem and the increased prevalence of multi-drug resistant pathogens make it imperative that alternative remedies be found. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 64 healthy women given daily oral capsules of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus fermentum RC-14 for 60 days showed no adverse effects. Microscopy analysis showed restoration from asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis microflora to a normal lactobacilli colonized microflora in 37% women during lactobacilli treatment compared to 13% on placebo (P=0.02). Lactobacilli were detected in more women in the lactobacilli-treated group than in the placebo group at 28 day (P=0.08) and 60 day (P=0.05) test points. Culture findings confirmed a significant increase in vaginal lactobacilli at day 28 and 60, a significant depletion in yeast at day 28 and a significant reduction in coliforms at day 28, 60 and 90 for lactobacilli-treated subjects versus controls. The combination of probiotic L. rhamnosus GR-1 and L. fermentum RC-14 is not only safe for daily use in healthy women, but it can reduce colonization of the vagina by potential pathogenic bacteria and yeast.

PMID: 12628548 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

I realize these studies do not say definitively that probiotics DO help prevent GBS infections, but they do say that they might. Considering that probiotics are not harmful (as far as I know) adding them as a preventitive measure may be of some benefit. What do all of you think?

Henci Goer
Posts:0

07/27/2008 11:46 PM Quote Reply

The abstracts for these studies sound intriguing. I have not heard of any harm of probiotics (anyone who has, please chime in!), so I don't see any reason not to try probiotics as a preventive measure. The best that can happen is that they knock out GBS and a woman who would have been positive for GBS tests negative. At worst, they can help maintain/restore the normal bacterial population if a woman has IV antibiotics in labor for GBS colonization. It's a win both ways.

-- Henci    

tcwyles (guest)

08/10/2008 7:31 AM Quote Reply
I just got my GBS screen results back. It was negative this time. With my first child, I was positive. I have been taking probiotics in anticipation of taking oral antibiotics (having an HBAC), so maybe the probiotics do help.
Henci Goer
Posts:0

08/10/2008 3:15 PM Quote Reply

Well, GBS comes and goes, so your experience doesn't constitute evidence in the formal sense of the word. Still, the bottom line is that so far as I know, probiotics don't hurt, and you may be an example that they might help.

-- Henci

Add Reply
Forums > Normal Birth Forum >
Pregnancy Conditions & Complications > Group B Strep prevention with probiotics



ActiveForums 3.6