Home  | Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Login  
    Normal Birth Forum


Normal Birth Forum Featuring Henci Goer
Subject: 40.5 weeks - OB want's to induce tomorrow.

Add Reply   
Page 1 of 212 > >>
Author Messages
NotSure (guest)

07/07/2008 2:03 PM Quote Reply
I will be at 41 weeks on Wednesday and the baby still hasn't dropped. Doc said he wants to induce tomorrow night for a Wednesday delivery. He said that most likely this will be a c-section delivery as the baby is still at a high station.

I do have the option to come in later this week, have the baby's condition evaluated, and if it's doing well then I can wait until next Monday to be induced if it still hasn't come (which will be 2 days shy of 42 weeks). My problem is that if it comes before Monday I would most likely be seen by a different OB due to scheduling conflicts.

I really like my OB, he's the best one in this area and has a very low c-section rate. However I'm worried that if I wait past Wednesday, and something happens before Monday, then I will be at the mercy of whatever OB is on call.

I guess my question is, if my OB says I have a high probability of delivering via c-section, would it be prudent to give it a couple of more days and risk delivering with an unknown OB?

Thanks for any advice you can give.

NotSure (guest)

07/07/2008 2:11 PM Quote Reply
I forgot to mention that the doc says I have a good amount of fluid and a healthy heart rate. Also, the baby is head down but kind of laying on it's side, so it's mall-positioned.

I saw my chiropractor this morning to have the Webster technique performed to see if it helps the baby position correctly. I know this is typically used to turn a breached baby, but I am hoping this might help. He did say my pelvis was out of alignment and the baby seemed to move into a different position after he was done.

I'm not sure if this will help the baby drop, but if I wait until Monday it would give me time to have a few more adjustments. Any advice on weather this helps would be appreciated.

Thanks again.

Henci Goer
Posts:0

07/07/2008 3:34 PM Quote Reply

Unless there is a compelling medical reason to induce, I recommend waiting. Here are my reasons why:

  • The recommendation to induce routinely at 41 weeks is controversial. The main trial that supports it has major problems. I have done an analysis of it on the "When Research Is Flawed" section of this website.
  • The median length of pregnancy in 1st-time mothers who reach full term is 41 wks 1 day, meaning half of first-time mothers go into labor before 41 wks 1 day and the other half after this length of pregnancy. In other words, induction is being recommended for a healthy pregnancy in the middle of its normal range.

and most importantly,

  • Elective induction of labor, which this would be, is associated with an increase in cesarean surgery rates.

    Goer H, Sagady Leslie M, Romano A. Step 6: Does Not Routinely Employ Practices, Procedures Unsupported by Scientific Evidence. J Perinat Educ 2007;16(1):32S-64S. 

I would also be concerned about an ob--however low his cesarean surgery rate--who is already predicting a cesarean for you. There are any number of studies that show that what the care provider thinks about the woman's likelihood of cesarean affects judgment. You can see how this would play out: "Well, she's not going to deliver this baby vaginally anyway, so why not just get it over with, and I can go home." 

Of course, you don't know whether the new ob will think any differently, but at least you have a few more days to go into labor on your own. You are likely to do that. The same study that found that half the group of healthy 1st-time moms were still pregnant at 41 wks 1 day also found that only a few percent still hadn't had their babies by 42 wks.

And if you want your best shot at avoiding an unnecessary cesarean, you can't go wrong with Lamaze's "Six Care Practices that Support Normal Birth."

-- Henci

NotSure (guest)

07/07/2008 3:54 PM Quote Reply
Thank you so much for the information. My husband and I attended your presentation at Birthways in Berkeley and have been relying on your book so far, but all this last minute stuff has us questioning things again.

I guess my only real concern right now is getting the baby to move into the right position. It's head down, but slightly tilted to one side. I think the term for this is Asynclitic. Do you have any suggestions (links?) on techniques to facilitate the baby moving down, or do I just need to let things happen naturally?

Thanks.
maria (guest)

07/07/2008 5:07 PM Quote Reply
You can try techniques as described on Spinningbabies.com

Also, many babies adjust position during labor. Worth waiting and seeing how labor unfolds, imo.

I would avoid squatting till baby was in a better position. This is interesting information your OB should know http://www.midwiferytoday.com/articles/paininback.asp
Could you a midwife assist your birth?

Other things midwives do http://www.gentlebirth.org/archives/position.html#Asynclitic

Have a great birth!
maria.
NotSure (guest)

07/07/2008 6:28 PM Quote Reply
I'm not familiar with how I would find a mid-wife in my area. Are they willing to step in with only a few days notice?
maria (guest)

07/07/2008 6:57 PM Quote Reply
I don't think so, but some hospitals have cnm's and you could look into that. Many of the things I posted you can do yourself though, except of course the manual turning, lol.
NotSure (guest)

07/07/2008 8:26 PM Quote Reply
OK, thanks again for the info. We found a suggestion to try a pressure point on my left foot, small toe that seems to be doing some good. After two tries the baby is now moving into a more central position. Also spent about 45 minutes in the pool so this might have contributed. Will keep trying things and hope for the best


maria (guest)

07/07/2008 9:04 PM Quote Reply
Oh, that is good to hear!
Henci Goer
Posts:0

07/08/2008 4:47 PM Quote Reply

To Maria's suggestions I would add avoid an epidural so you can be walking and changing positions. If you have one, choose upright or side-lying positions; stay off your back. Refuse having your membranes broken early in the dilation process. As long as they are intact, the cushion of fluid ahead of the baby's head allows the baby room to wriggle and swivel into a better position, and the forces of labor will tend to guide this process as well. If someone ruptures membranes, the gush can pull the baby prematurely into the pelvic inlet in the unfavorable position, where it will be more difficult to maneuver. Of course, if membranes rupture on their own, it can't be helped.

Please let us know how everything goes.

-- Henci

NotSure (guest)

07/08/2008 8:17 PM Quote Reply

Yes, I am definately going to try to avoid an epidural. The baby has been moving around a lot since we started these techniques, but it still hasn't dropped at all (still feels like -4 station).

Question, how many centimeters should I be at (approximately) before I allow them to rupture the membranes?

My OB is scheduling me to come in next Wednesday to induce if nature hasn't run its course. This will be 42 weeks + or - one day. Hopefully it will come before then.

NotSure (guest)

07/09/2008 12:38 AM Quote Reply
Do the odds increase that the baby will stress more if induced at 42 weeks versus 41 weeks? 
Jenn (guest)

07/09/2008 5:21 PM Quote Reply
Posted By n/a on 07/08/2008 8:17 PM

Question, how many centimeters should I be at (approximately) before I allow them to rupture the membranes?

 



Without medical indication?  10 cm, fully effaced, +20 inch station.

Seriously...there is not a medical need to rupture membranes prior to birth in most cases.  It generally will make your labor more painful for mom (possibly baby as well?), may put the baby in a poor position, can result in more head molding, can increase the odds of a pinched umbillical cord.  There are also the extremely rare complications of possibly causing the cord to prolapse, or causing a cord rupture with a cord that has a "velatamous insertation"--that is, the cord goes through the bag then implants in the placenta rather than implanting directly in the placenta and being completely encased in the bag (this is extremely, EXTREMELY rare because you are combining an extremely rare natural complication with then a rare Dr. caused complication).  It is of limited benefit in speeding up labor--research shows that it really isn't effective at that until you are past about 7 cms, and you might not WANT to be sped up at that point, understanding that speeding up labor will make it more intense.  Some care providers will argue that they want to rupture the bag to check for meconium...but I had a client with spontaneous rupture for over 40 hrs prior to birth, and we didn't know that there was THICK meconium until after the baby's head was born!  Research has repeatedly shown that suctioning for meconium is ineffective in preventing complications, and may actually cause some of its own.

I find in my doula clients that if they didn't have spontaneous rupture prior to the onset of contractions, they typically have rupture as they enter transition, and birth happens very soon after.  I've only had one client get to pushing stage with intact membranes, and her OB was really insistent on breaking the water at that point, so the mom decided it just wasn't worth the fight so let the Dr. break the membranes--ironically, this baby had a velatamous insertation!

Henci Goer
Posts:0

07/09/2008 11:28 PM Quote Reply
Posted By n/a on 07/08/2008 8:17 PM

Yes, I am definately going to try to avoid an epidural. The baby has been moving around a lot since we started these techniques, but it still hasn't dropped at all (still feels like -4 station).

Question, how many centimeters should I be at (approximately) before I allow them to rupture the membranes?

My OB is scheduling me to come in next Wednesday to induce if nature hasn't run its course. This will be 42 weeks + or - one day. Hopefully it will come before then.


I hope so too. As for when to allow rupture of membranes, I would say as a routine measure, never. Sometimes, though, when progress has stalled late in the dilation phase, rupturing membranes may be recommended as a remedy to bring the head against the cervix without the cushion of fluid so that when contractions press the baby downward, the head can help to open it. (Think pulling a turtleneck sweater over your head.) The most common time for membranes to break on their own is late in first stage or with the first push, so breaking them at this point in labor would be in line with normal physiology.

Breaking the bag should not be done when the head is high because of the chance of the umbilical cord coming down ahead of the baby. This is an obstetric emergency requiring a cesarean because it will get pinched between the baby's head and the mother's pelvis. Once the head is low in the pelvis, it is like an egg in an egg cup. There is no room for the cord to get ahead of the baby's head.

-- Henci

 


Henci Goer
Posts:0

07/09/2008 11:34 PM Quote Reply
Posted By n/a on 07/09/2008 12:38 AM
Do the odds increase that the baby will stress more if induced at 42 weeks versus 41 weeks? 



I don't know the answer to that. I do know that induced labors are more stressful for the baby than spontaneous labor. You can see why that would be. If the body isn't ready to labor, then it tends to take harder contractions over a longer period to move labor along. Also, strategies to ripen the cervix do a good job, but there is more to effective labor than a softened cervix, so even with cervical ripening, the cesarean rate is higher than with labor that starts on its own. Induction is most likely to work when the cervix is soft and effaced, but that is when it is least useful because the woman will likely soon go into labor on her own.

-- Henci

NotSure (guest)

07/10/2008 2:51 PM Quote Reply

We just returned from doc office and the NST and ultrasound looked really good, but baby is still on side facing left. I also still have plenty of fluid, and the baby's weight / size is right at the 50 percentile, so doc seems to be OK with waiting (even though they think I'm strange for doing so).

While I was hooked up to the monitor I was suprised to see that I was having regular contractions every few minutes. The nurse had to point them out, as I couldn't really feel them. Hopefully they will turn into the real thing soon.

I'll keep you updated as soon as things progress.

Henci Goer
Posts:0

07/11/2008 1:37 AM Quote Reply

That's great! Those contractions are the real thing, just early in the real thing. They can do good work for you softening the cervix, effacing it, and pulling it forward in line with the baby's head. They may even get dilation started. Trust your body. It knows how to do this. You're just along for the ride. It's great too that your OB is willing to listen to you and work with you.

-- Henci

maria (guest)

07/11/2008 2:40 AM Quote Reply
I am so glad you are still pregnant!

Here is to a good labor!


Henci Goer
Posts:0

07/11/2008 7:35 PM Quote Reply

. . . and an easy birth to a beautiful, healthy baby!

-- Henci

NotSure (guest)

07/14/2008 7:40 PM Quote Reply

41 weeks and 3 days.  I had another NST and AFI.  Everything looks great!  The heart rate is strong and there is plenty of fluid.  After this visit I saw my OB and he is still very concerned that we have decided to wait until after 42 weeks (this Friday).  My dilation and station of the baby has not changed since two weeks ago.  How long should one wait before inducing?  Am I jeopardizing my baby's health by waiting?       

My Ob wants me to pick a date early next week for induction.  His recommendation is to come in the night before to ripen/dilate my cervix with the foley balloon.  In the morning he will rupture my membranes and then start the pitocin.  He mentioned that because the baby was still so high (-4 station) that labor would not start without breaking the membranes.  He doesn't think the baby will drop without rupturing membranes.  Would appreciate any advice/information.  Thanks! 

       

Add Reply
Page 1 of 212 > >>

Forums > Normal Birth Forum >
Pregnancy Conditions & Complications > 40.5 weeks - OB want's to induce tomorrow.



ActiveForums 3.6